1/27/15
Today
we toured the main and engineering quads. We started the tour on the steps of
Foellinger Auditorium. As we looked down the main quad, it was clear that it
was built with the concept of collective building in mind. Though many of the
buildings had been erected at different times from one another, they shared
similar appearances. They are all made out of a reddish stone. They all have
lighter colored stone accents. They also all have a common edge with the
buildings around them. They are all around the same height and width. This
helps give a unified and symmetrical feeling to the quad.
Foellinger
is a very important building on the quad. Sitting directly on the main axis, it
commands the attention and reverence of all who walk down the quad. Its domed
shape echoes that of the Pantheon, after which it was modeled. The dome itself
is important because, in American culture, the dome has been associated with
democracy. All of these things lend themselves to making Foellinger a fantastic
place to hold large lectures of the students that make up the university or the
put important speakers.
The
Union is another important building on the quad. It was originally intended to
be in the shape of a block I, however, Harker Hall was blocking one of the
pavilions. This building is one of the oldest on campus and was designed by U
of I’s first architect, then director. For this reason, it was allowed to
remain, and the Union’s original design was never fully realized.
This
takes us to the end of the quad. Here, we notice a shift in the axis. This was
to account for the buildings that were already in existence when the
Engineering quad was set up. They couldn’t continue the main axis, as it would
run through part of Engineering Hall, so they shifted the axis over. Grainger
takes on a curved shape so, as you approach it, it seems to be hugging the
quad, encompassing it a little, to make up for the awkward shape of the quad.
The
northern most part of the Engineering quad shifts back to the main axis. They
do this by having a local entrance to Grainger on the south end and the Beckman
Institute at the north end. The Beckman Institute was designed with the
intention of being a style that could be echoed around the quad or even the
campus. Here, they fell short because the design was focused around a rather
phallic like shape, which was difficult to replicate for a few reasons. There
wasn’t much else characteristic about the design other than the shape of the
outside. Beckman also acts as a wall that closes off the north of campus. This
is an interesting look into how architecture is intertwined with the
environment and society itself. While the top of campus could be a great place
to put an entrance to the university, Beckman offers no admittance to a place
that is intended to be a shrine to learning and wisdom. Therefore, the blocking
out of the community speaks poorly about the mentality of the university.
No comments:
Post a Comment